Those of you who've been following along know that I am mired in a first-pass edit of my current novel. One of the main goals of this edit is to reduce the overall word count. Currently at 123,319 words, I still have some work to do. However, considering it peaked at 135,785 words before editing had begun, I think I'm doing OK.
Why care about word count at all? Because staying within the acceptable range is one less reason to be rejected, that's why.
Still, how long is too long? At what point do you know you're in the right, saleable range?
First, it depends on stature. Established authors have more leeway; they've got a proven track record, and a publisher is more likely to lay out the cash (longer books cost more to produce) because they are considered less of a risk than a first-time author.
Second, you have your first-time authors. Publishers want minimum risk and maximum profit, so they'll likely stick to their guns on word count unless you've produced a truly stellar, standout novel.
Third, it depends on genre.
Let's take that third one and break it down based on word count information gotten from Colleen Lindsay of the swivet blog, with an understanding that there are always exceptions to these numbers. Here's the data:
||50K - 80K
||80K - 90K
||60K - 70K
||60K - 80K
||up to 120K
||90K - 100K
||up to 140K
||up to 100K
||120K - 130K
I write fantasy, so the last two categories are of the most interest to me. I find those numbers a bit alarming because my book is not epic fantasy. It's more non-epic. Therefore, I need to cut out another 23,000 words??? I'm all for killing my darlings, but cutting to 100,000 words is a tough one.
Rachelle Gardner, an agent with WordServe Literary, has this definition:
Full-length fiction: 80,000 to 100,000 words is by far the best range to stay within. Some pubs will look at manuscripts from 70,000 to 110,000 words, rarely outside of that.
OK, so now we're at a maximum of 110,000 words. But she doesn't mention specific genre, which we know from above is important.
JA Konrath has this to say:
First novels have a better chance of selling if they are under 90k. The reason is wholly monetary. Your publisher will probably lose money on your first book. But a 150k book will cost more to print, more to ship, and less will fit in a carton. Cost of production figures heavily into a publisher's decision whether to buy or not to buy.
He goes on to say this (highlighting mine):
Some genres, such as fantasy and historical romance, tend to be lengthier.
But he doesn't really go on to explain in more detail. That's OK. Joe's thing is mystery thrillers, anyway, not fantasy. (Consequently, Joe has some great advice in that post; go read it.)
So where does that leave me?
I could no doubt troll the submission guideline pages of my favorite agents and publishers and acquire more information, but I think the above more or less supports what I had originally thought on this subject. One thing is clear: I need to keep cutting. There comes a point, however, where the story itself becomes compromised. I'll have to cross that bridge when I come to it. For now, I have a new goal: 110,000 words.
Join my reader's group and get The Hall of Riddles (An Alchemancer Prequel), an exclusive story for subscribers only, and The Killing Knife (Tales of the Assassin Without a Name #1-3) as a welcome gift.